Markel Insurance Co. v. Muzyka
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I. Introduction
The sole legal issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly determined that the medical expense claim of Appellee Jill Muzyka, individually and as next friend and parent of Kennedy Mu-zyka, a minor, was covered under an insurance policy issued by Appellant Markel Insurance Company to the ASI Gymnatic Center. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm the trial court’s judgment.
II. Factual and Procedural Background
Our recitation of the pertinent facts in this case is taken from an agreed statement of facts signed by the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Kelley-Coppedge, Inc. v. Highlands Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Seabright Insurance Company v. Maximina Lopez, Beneficiary of Candelario LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Rice v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Admiral Insurance v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Fawcett v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. DuranteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.