Legal Opinion
Pollack v. Meese
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-1395 SSHPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion to dismiss of defendants Edwin A. Meese, III, J. Michael Quinlan, George Wilkerson, and C.A. Turner, plaintiffs opposition, defendants’ reply, and the entire record herein. The Court concludes that this Court does not have personal jurisdiction over the defendants and that the complaint should be dismissed.
Background
The following facts are taken from the pro se complaint filed in this case by the plaintiff Seymour Pollack. While incarcerated at the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Margaret Daly-Murphy v. Michael Winston, E. Carmack Holmes, Arthur S. Kling, Ronald L. Nelson and the Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Luise Light v. Isabel WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cuthbert O. Simpkins v. District of Columbia GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- James Cameron v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Banks v. LappinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Walton v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Scinto v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.