Legal Opinion
Lifewise Master Funding v. Telebank
District Court, D. Utah
Decided February 6, 2002No. 00-CV-495-BPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The defendant, Telebank, n/k/a E*Trade Bank (hereinafter E*Trade), made a motion on December 2, 2000 for a protective order requiring plaintiffs Lifewise Master Funding, LLC and Life Wise Family Financial Security Inc. (Lifewise) and plaintiffs counsel, Manning, Curtis, Bradshaw and Bednar, LLC, to return copies of documents Telebank contends were protected by the Attorney/Client privilege or work product privilege based on a claim that the documents, produced as part of E*Trade’s Rule 26(a) F.R.C.P. initial disclosures, were…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Employer's Reinsurance Corp. v. Clarendon National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
- Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. CaremarkPCS Health, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.