Legal Opinion
Talley v. American Bakeries Co.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided April 19, 1954No. Civ. A. Nos. 2268 & 2269PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.
Motion has been made by defendant that these cases be stricken from the jury docket, because of alleged non-compliance with Rule 81(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. The pertinent portion of Rule 81(c) is as follows:
“(c) Removed Actions. These rules apply to civil actions removed to the United States district courts from the state courts and govern procedure after removal. * * * If at the time of removal all neces*392sary pleadings have been served, a party entitled to trial by jury under Rule 38 shall be accorded it, if his demand therefor is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Cain v. Commercial Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Savell v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Goade v. VollrathDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1948
- Guernsey v. CrossU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- R. Michael Butner v. Ingrid NeustadterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Istituto Per Lo Sviluppo Economico Dell' Italia Meridionale v. Sperti Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Edna H. Pagel, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union 595Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Edna H. Pagel, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union 595Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.