Legal Opinion

Martineau v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 12, 1976No. 46461PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

Kelly, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the special verdict and a new'trial against defendant Dr. Carleton A. Nelson on the issue of damages or for a new trial against both defendants. We reverse with instructions to grant a new trial against both defendants on the issues of their negligence and the contributory negligence of plaintiff wife, and on the issue of damages.

This is an action by plaintiffs, husband and wife, against two physicians for alleged malpractice and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Coleman v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  3. Terrell v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Christensen v. ThornbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Ferguson v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Sherlock v. Stillwater ClinicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Jensen v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Speck v. FinegoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API