Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
The principal question raised on this appeal is whether and to what extent com-pensable damages may be recovered for the birth of a normal, healthy child proximately caused by a negligently performed sterilization operation. We hold that in eases such as this an action for “wrongful conception” may be maintained, and that compensatory damages may be recovered by the parents of the unplanned child. These damages may include all prenatal and postnatal medical expenses, the mother’s pain and suffering during pregnancy and delivery, and loss of consortium. Additionally, the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Gleitman v. CosgroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Cockrum v. BaumgartnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.