Legal Opinion

State v. Newkirk

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1993No. 59203-9PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, C.J.

Facts of Case

The Court of Appeals reversed the defendant's conviction of robbery in the second degree and, based on our speedy trial rule (CrR 3.3(d)(2)), dismissed the charges against him. We granted the State's petition for review, reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the conviction.

On December 8, 1988, the defendant in this case, James David Newkirk, was charged with the crime of robbery in the second degree. He was arraigned on December 12, 1988. Trial was originally set for March 1989, but was rescheduled, with the defendant's agreement, for May 4, 1989. According to his counsel,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. State v. NewkirkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. HackettWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. LedenkoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API