Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Reaser

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 2004PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.

¶ 1 Appellant, Brandt James Reaser, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred as a matter of law when it found him guilty of violating the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code at 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 4902(a) (governing restrictions on use of highways and bridges). Specifically, Appellant challenges his conviction by asserting he qualified under the statutory exemption for use of a weight-restricted road. Under the circumstances of this case, we hold the statutory exemption did not require Appel lant to limit his use of the weight-restricted road to the shortest distance on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BullickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. CassidySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. VetriniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KimbroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. LloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. In the Interest of R.D.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API