Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 15, 2008No. 1920 EDA 2007PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Yusef Mitchell, appeals from the judgment of sentence, entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, following revocation of his “special” probation. Appellant asks us to determine whether the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (“Board”) had exclusive jurisdiction over his special probation for purposes of revocation and re-sentencing following revocation. Consistent with established Pennsylvania law, we hold the trial court retained the power, authority, or jurisdiction to determine whether Appellant violated his special probation, to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. In Re Private Criminal Complaint of WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. HooverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Com. v. Simmons, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Com. v. Mathias, S., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Com. v. Alexander, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Coffield, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Hyman,K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API