Legal Opinion
Plowman v. Cheney
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 5, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-00073-APublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
Introduction
This is a discrimination action under the Vocational & Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791 et seq. (the “Act”). Plaintiff, a civilian employee of the Army Morale Welfare Recreation Fund, a Nonappropriat-ed Fund Instrumentality (NAFI) of the Department of the Army, alleges that defendants violated the Act by forcing him to resign after a test indicated he was HIV seropositive. 1 This is plaintiff’s second attempt to obtain a remedy for his forced resignation. The first was based on theories of contract, implied covenants, right of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Margaret Nealon v. Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the Army, Clarence Thomas, Chairman, Equal Opportunity CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Saunders v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Bass v. BurleighDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1989
- Caplinger v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
- Persons v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.