Legal Opinion
Persons v. Runyon
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 6, 1998No. 96-4089-RDRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
This ease is now before the court upon defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment.
The general guidelines for analyzing summary judgment motions were reviewed by the Tenth Circuit in Martin v. Nannie and the Newborns, Inc., 3 F.3d 1410, 1414 (10th Cir.1993):
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davis v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023