Legal Opinion
People v. Forster
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1994No. D020031PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, Acting P. J.
A jury found Daniel Joseph Forster guilty of one count of driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of Vehicle Code 1 section 23152, subdivision (a), one count of driving while having a blood-alcohol concentration of .08 percent or more in violation of section 23152, subdivision (b), and one count of driving with a suspended license in violation of section 14601.2, subdivision (a). In connection with allegations under counts 1 and 2 that Forster’s blood-alcohol content was .20 percent or more (§ 23206.1), the jury was unable to make findings, and the trial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- People v. AguileraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- State v. GarbuttSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- People v. PILSTERCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.