Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1978No. Crim. 2888PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TUTTLE, J.*

After a jury trial, defendant was found to be guilty of felony hit-and-run driving (Veh. Code, § 20001), not guilty of engaging in a speed contest (Veh. Code, § 23109, subd. (a)), and not guilty of engaging in an exhibition of speed (Veh. Code, § 23109, subd. (b)). The jury was unable to reach a verdict on four counts of vehicular manslaughter (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. 3(a)).

Defendant was placed on probation, and he has appealed,1 seeking reversal of his conviction of felony hit-and-run driving on the grounds of inconsistent verdicts and inadequate and misleading instructions.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. BirreutaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. PahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. People v. GuthrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. McNieceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API