McConnell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Kalish,
Petitioner, Barbara McConnell, seeks review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed that portion of a referee’s decision to award attorney’s fees to petitioner upon concluding there was no reasonable basis to contest the claim. There is no appeal involving the basic award of compensation. We affirm the Board.
Our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether constitutional rights were violated, an error of law was committed, or whether necessary findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Section 704…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Edmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Centorame v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- Majesky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Dworek v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- MacNeill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Yeagle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Elite Carpentry Contractors & General Accident Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.