Legal Opinion
Harper v. Moran
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 4, 1935No. 6329PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, Associate Justice.
Appellee is the receiver of the North Capital Savings Bank, -duly appointed in that capacity by the Comptroller of the Cur*981rency. The bank is an Arizona corporation. Its charter provides that its principal place of business shall be in the city of Washington, District of Columbia. It maintained a banking house in Washington and conducted a banking business there and nowhere else. Appellant is a stockholder owning and holding 200 shares of the capital stock of the bank. Article 14, § 11, of the Constitution of Arizona provides: “The shareholders or stockholders of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bushnell v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Thomas v. MatthiessenSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States Sav. Bank v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Moran v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Thompson v. Park Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Dunn v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Hamilton v. OffuttCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.