Goldman v. Christy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
The above entitled cause was before this court upon a former appeal, when a new trial was granted the defendants, 155 Minn. 91,192 N. W. 360. Upon the going down of the mandate, defendants served a notice upon counsel for the plaintiff to tax costs, to which written objections were filed to the effect that no order for judgment had been made in favor of the defendants. On April 3, 1923, judgment was entered by the clerk in favor of the defendants to the effect that plaintiff take nothing by this action and that defendants, with the exception of defendant Christy, recover of plaintiff the sum…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Norris v. District Court First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Scott v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Goldman v. ChristySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Lundberg v. Single Men's Endowment Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Oldenberg v. DevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bogestad v. BothumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Deacon v. HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931