Cheshire v. Hightower
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. “The form of the contract is immaterial, provided the fact of suretyship exists.” Civil Code (1910), §§ 3541, 3556. Thus, one who signs a note with another apparently as a joint principal may in an action by the payee plead and prove that he had no interest in the paper and was only surety for the accommodation of the other and principal signer, and that the plaintiff took the note with knowledge of such facts. Seymour v. Bank of Thomasville, 157 Ga. 99 (1) (121 S. E. 578); Hall v. Capital Bank of Macon, 71 Ga. 715; Buck v. Bank of State of Ga., 104 Ga. 660, 663 (30 S. E. 872); Hall v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cordray v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- McKibben v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Trammell v. Swift Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Buck v. Bank of StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Cloud v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atlanta Journal Co. v. DoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Franklin Savings & Loan Co. v. BrananCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Benson v. HenningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Boles v. Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- La Boon v. Wright & LocklinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930