Trammell v. Swift Fertilizer Works
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint on note. Before Judge Littlejohn. Stewart superior court. June 16, 1904.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
The Swift Fertilizer Works, for the use of Carter & Patterson, brought suit against H. N. Bailey and D. 0. Trammell, to recover an amount alleged to be due on a promissory note, a copy of which was attached to the petition. The note contained a promise to pay the Swift Fertilizer Works $162.75, and recited that “ The payment of this note is secured by a lien to the extent of said advance, on all the crops which may be grown or cultivated *779on said farm or plantation during the year 1901, wherever said crops, parts or part of them are to be found.” It was signed by H. N. Bailey and D. 0.…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Bishop v. Georgia National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Bank of Lumpkin County v. JustusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Campbell v. RybertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Williams v. Peoples Bank of SummitCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Hardy v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.