McKibben v. Fourth National Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. The cardinal rule in the construction of contracts is to ascertain the intention of the parties. If that intention be clear, and it contravenes no rule of law, and sufficient words be used to arrive at the intention, it shall be enforced, irrespective of all technical or arbitrary rules of construction. Civil Code (1910), § 4266. As to whether a contract is one of suretyship or of guaranty, “as with other contracts, the whole matter is governed by the intention of the parties.” Baggs v. Funderburke, 11 Ga. App. 173, 174 (74 S. E. 937). The language which the parties have used will be…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McMillan v. Heard National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Baggs v. FunderburkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Etheridge v. Rawleigh Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Jones v. EzellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Musgrove v. Luther Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chalkley v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Walton v. DatryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Romine, Inc. v. Savannah Steel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Kennedy v. Thruway Service City, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Fagelson v. Pfister Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.