Legal Opinion
Miller v. Johnson
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1962No. 96PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
The Millers appeal from an order dismissing their action against the Johnsons. Their complaint alleged that they had a written agreement to construct a dwelling for the Johnsons, and that the latter had breached the contract by refusing to allow the Millers to complete the construction and by refusing to make payments dtte according to the terms of the agreement. Damages were sought in the amount of $150,000 for loss of business reputation and credit, and for injury to the health of the Millers.
The Johnsons moved to dismiss the action on two grounds: (1) that the complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kendall v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Baird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. NesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Esquire, Inc. v. Varga Enterprises, Inc. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Shooshanian v. WagnerAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Linck v. Barokas & Martin, R.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Martin v. MearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Christensen v. NCH Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Larson v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.