Legal Opinion
Esquire, Inc. v. Varga Enterprises, Inc. (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 12, 1950No. 10217_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
The suit of plaintiff, Esquire, Inc., having resulted in a judgment that defendants Vargas and Varga Enterprises, Inc., have infringed its trade-mark rights and unfairly competed with it and that Vargas be restrained from working for other persons, defendants prosecute this appeal, contending that, (1), plaintiff is barred from all or at least part of the relief obtained by reason of what happened in a previous trial; (2), if it is not so bound, the injunction against Vargas from working for others is so unconscionable as not to be equitable; (3), the evidence does not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- United States v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Cleveland v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Vargas v. Esquire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. Larry Salkeld Appeal of Donald E. PinchockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Union Paving Company v. Downer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Franklin Mint Corp. v. National Wildlife Art Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- John P. Phillips v. Daniel Shannon, President of the Chicago Park District, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Douglas v. Los Angeles Herald-ExaminerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.