Legal Opinion

Little Pep Delmonico Restaurant, Inc. v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1960No. 250PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The question for decision is: Did the court err in granting injunctive relief pending a final determination of the validity of the ordinance, or must plaintiff and other interested parties await criminal prosecution to test its validity? The court found the action was instituted on behalf of 100 merchants in Charlotte who had erected signs in conformity with permits issued by the City as authorized by an ordinance in effect prior to the adoption of the challenged ordinance. It found that to remove and replace these signs would cost in excess of $200,000; hence enforcement of the ordinance, if…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. In Re Appeal of O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. . WhitlockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Dixie Poster Advertising Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API