Legal Opinion

How & Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 7, 1882PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Ma/rshall Gvrouit Court. This is an appeal of H. E. J. Boardman, receiver in case of How & Co. and Greer & Co., from a decree requiring bim to pay over to the clerk of the court the amount of money paid to and received by Mm, found by the court to be $1,308.95. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This proceeding grows out of the case of George M. How & Co. and others v. Jones, 57 Iowa, 130, to which for the facts, so far as applicable, reference is now made. In the main action of How & Co. and others v. Jones, H. E. J *72Boardman, was on the 10th day of April, 1877, in vacation, appointed receiver. Afterward Caswell & Meeker and S. Binford intervened and filed a motion to remove the receiver. On the 6th day of August, 1879, in vacation, the court decreed that the intervenors had no rights in the property, and denied the motion to remove the receiver, and ordered that the receiver apply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Radford v. FolsomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  2. Howe & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  3. Bennett v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Andrew v. Sac County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Crawford v. FickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Howe & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Reardon v. YoungquistAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  5. PSL Realty Co. v. Granite Investment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API