Legal Opinion

Howe & Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 24, 1885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Cov/rt. This is an appeal by tbe intervenors from an order of tbe district court, approving the final report of a receiver appointed in tbe main case, and allowing bis account.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

Tbe plaintiffs each recovered a judgment against Binford Bros, in the district court of Marshall county. Executions were issued on each of these judgments, and H. E. J. Boardman was garnished thereon. He answered that be bad in bis possession certain notes and mortgages belonging to Binford Bros. Plaintiffs then instituted this proceeding, making E. R. Jones, tbe clerk of tbe district court, defendant. They alleged in their petition that, in a certain cause between Binford Bros, and Boardman, tbe garnishee, in which tbe ownership of said notes and mortgages referred to was in controversy, tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howe & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Ross v. LoomisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. How & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Cross v. B. & S. W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. Krapfel v. PfiffnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ephraim v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Frick v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Bellamy v. Washita Valley Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. First National Bank of Laramie v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Finneran v. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API