Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Fickey

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1895PublishedCited by 16 opinions

cited 24 W. Va. 279; Code, c. 139, ss. 1, 2, 5; 27 W. Ya. 173, 617; 37 W. Ya. 762; Code, c. 140, s. 2. cited 27 W. Va. 617, 638, 639.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

In a suit in equity in the Circuit Court of Randolph county, brought by George W. Yokum, commissioner of school lands, against Fickey and Thomas, to sell certain lands as forfeited for the benefit of the school fund, Fickey and Thomas filed a petition asking leave to redeem the lands, and paid into court a sum of money to effect such redemption; and a decree was made allowing them to redeem, and ascertaining that Fickey and Thomas had paid *545in more money than necessary for the redemption, and directing Bushrod W. Crawford, general receiver of the court, to pay out of the fund…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Sweeney v. BakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Morgan v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Ruhl v. RuhlWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Eureka Pipe Line Co. v. RiggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  3. Childers v. LoudinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Boylan v. HinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. BonerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API