Legal Opinion

Falkenstern v. Herman Kussy Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 2, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leyden, 0. C. J.

This suit was instituted by the plaintiff as assignee of Fruitcrest Corporation, for a matured debt owed by the defendant to the assignor amounting to $1,412.50 for goods sold and delivered.

Defendant’s answer admits the debt but denies the validity of the assignment and “by way of counter-claim,” sets up substantially it is the assignee of two choses in action of Wallace, Burton & Davis Co., Inc., against Fruitcrest Corporation arising out of the alleged breach of an implied warranty that the merchandise sold to it by Fruitcrest was fit for human consumption, whereby it lost…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Godkin v. BaileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  2. Yeskel v. GrossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. H. John Homan Co. v. Wilkes-BarreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  2. Continental Ins. Co. v. BoraieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  3. Peirson v. HollingsworthSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  4. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. OatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. James Talcott, Inc. v. H. Corenzwit and CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API