Legal Opinion

Godkin v. Bailey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*656The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

The plaintiff sued in assumpsit for the price of goods sold and delivered. The defendants1 pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that they would claim an offset for the difference in price paid by them for lumber which the plaintiff had failed to deliver. At the trial the defendants offered to prove -a failure of the plaintiff to deliver lumber under a contract several years before the sale of the goods for which the suit was brought, and that by reason of this failure the defendants were obliged to go into the market, 'where the prices…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Krausse v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Gayle Martz, Inc. v. SHERPA PET GROUP, LLC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Falkenstern v. Herman Kussy Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  4. Westminster Metal & Foundry Co. v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Scarano v. ScaranoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API