Allied Grocers Co-Operative v. Sadl, No. Cv92 03 85 25 (Mar. 13, 1992)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS (#106) The issue before the court is, should the defendant's motion to dismiss be granted on the ground that service of process was insufficient?
It is found that the defendant was not served at his usual place of abode, pursuant to General Statutes 52-57 (a). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss should be granted.
The plaintiff, Allied Grocers Co-operative, filed a one count complaint on January 31, 1992, against the defendants, Anton Sadl, John W. Hancock, Jr., Inc., and Gary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Earle v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Clover v. UrbanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Capitol Light & Supply Co. v. Gunning Electric Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1963
- Balkun v. DeAnzonaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.