Legal Opinion

Capitol Light & Supply Co. v. Gunning Electric Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 1, 1963No. File 131951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.

The defendant Stratton J. Gunning has entered a special appearance and a plea in abatement, claiming that no process was legally served upon him in this action. The endorsement of the deputy sheriff attests that service was made upon him on November 22,1962, “at the usual place of abode,” which appeared in evidence to be at 58 Ridgewood Road, West Hartford.

The evidence disclosed that he lived with his parents at this address for many years, where they still live, and that he is twenty-eight years old and unmarried. He actively participated in the family business in the named corporation,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. Merritt v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. Cugno v. KaelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Grant v. DalliberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
  5. Dorus v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rosa v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  2. Collins v. ScholzConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
  3. Sheldon v. FettigCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. Plonski v. HalloranConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
  5. United Bank of Loves Park v. DohmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API