Legal Opinion

Estate of Nale

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1974No. 168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The controlling issues are (1) whether the court erred in admitting evidence as to conversations with a deceased person, and (2) whether the statute of limitations, sec. 893.21 (5), 2 Stats., barred all but two years of the claim for personal services.

Sec. 885.16, Stats., commonly known as the dead man’s statute, provides, insofar as pertinent here, as follows:

“Transactions with deceased or insane persons. No party or person in his own behalf or interest, . . . shall be examined as a witness in respect to any transaction or communication by him personally with a deceased . . . person . . .…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. CoumbeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Schroeder v. Estate of VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Estate of MolayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Williams v. HeywoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Estate of SchaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of ReistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bethesda Church v. MenningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lovett v. Mt. Senario College, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  4. City of Madison Joint School District No. 8 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Havlicek/Fleisher Enterprises, Inc. v. BridgemanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API