Estate of Nale
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The controlling issues are (1) whether the court erred in admitting evidence as to conversations with a deceased person, and (2) whether the statute of limitations, sec. 893.21 (5), 2 Stats., barred all but two years of the claim for personal services.
Sec. 885.16, Stats., commonly known as the dead man’s statute, provides, insofar as pertinent here, as follows:
“Transactions with deceased or insane persons. No party or person in his own behalf or interest, . . . shall be examined as a witness in respect to any transaction or communication by him personally with a deceased . . . person . . .…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilcox v. CoumbeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Schroeder v. Estate of VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Estate of MolayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Williams v. HeywoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of SchaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Matter of Estate of ReistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Bethesda Church v. MenningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Lovett v. Mt. Senario College, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- City of Madison Joint School District No. 8 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Havlicek/Fleisher Enterprises, Inc. v. BridgemanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.