Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Coumbe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The questions arising upon the appeal maybe considered under three heads: (1) Whether the county court has jurisdiction to decree specific performance of a contract of a deceased person to transfer real estate. (2) Whether the evidence supports the finding that an oral agreement to transfer was made by the deceased. (3) Whether the acts of the respondents constitute such execution of the oral contract on their part as to warrant a decree for specific performance.(1) Sec. 296.02, Stats., gives concurrent power to the circuit and county courts to compel specific performance of contracts made by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doyle v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Brown v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McGinley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Woods v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Blanchard v. McDougalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Seraphine v. HardimanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Matter of Estate of LadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Estate of RosenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Kessler v. OlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Estate of Shinoe v. ShinoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API