Legal Opinion
People v. Finnegan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1995PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bellacosa, J.
Prior to his jury trial in the Town Court of Victor, defendant moved to suppress the otherwise valid results of a consensual breathalyzer test, claiming that his statutory right to an additional, independent test was violated. Defendant had been arrested for driving while intoxicated. After being transported to the police station, he consented to a breathalyzer test being administered and requested an additional blood test upon being advised of his statutory right.
The issue on this appeal is whether Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194 (4) (b), which promulgates the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pajak v. PajakNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Doctors Council v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. AlvarezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. TychanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Alonzo M. v. New York City Department of ProbationNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- People v. AnsteyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. Canadian Imperial Bank of CommerceNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Unruh v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. AtkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.