Legal Opinion
People v. Anstey
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 2006No. Docket 128368PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
Defendant was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or with an unlawful blood alcohol level (OUIL/UBAL), a violation of MCL 257.625(l)(a) or (b). Following defendant’s arrest, defendant agreed to take a police officer-administered chemical breath test of defendant’s bodily alcohol level. Under MCL 257.625a(6)(d), after having agreed to take the police-administered test, defendant was entitled to “a reasonable opportunity to have a person of his or her own choosing administer” an independent chemical test. The prosecution does not dispute the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. MardlinMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.