Legal Opinion
Doctors Council v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bellacosa, J.
We agree with the views expressed in the dissent at the Appellate Division that the pertinent statute is plain on its *672face, warranting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs on the first cause of action entitling them as part-time employees to membership in the New York City Employees’ Retirement System (NYCERS). Thus, the Appellate Division order insofar as appealed from should be reversed and the certified question answered in the negative.
Appellants are seven part-time doctors and their collective bargaining representative (jointly Doctors Council) which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sega v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hellerstein v. Assessor of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- New York State Bankers Ass'n v. AlbrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- People v. BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. FinneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. PaulinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Raritan Development Corp. v. SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Alonzo M. v. New York City Department of ProbationNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.