Hogue v. Massa
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRentto, J.
These appeals concern the right to interrogate a physician without the patient's consent on matters that are privileged under the physician-patient relationship, when his de position in a civil action, is taken before the trial for the purpose of discovery. The answer depends on whether there has been a waiver of the privilege.
On Saturday, June 27, 1959, Welton D. Hogue complained of severe abdominal pains. One of the defendants, Dr. Miller, an osteopathic physician was called to his home and ordered him taken to the defendant clinic for further examinations. He was there examined by Dr.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Becknell v. HosierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Doll v. ScandrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Torbensen v. Family Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Kramer v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Marfia v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Wheeldon v. MadisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Schutterle v. SchutterleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. Catch the BearSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Schaffer v. SpicerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.