Legal Opinion

Jacobson v. Hamman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1922No. File Nos. 4855, 5029PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Action on implied warranty of corn sold for seed purposes. There were separate appeals, one from the judgment, the other from an order denying a new trial.. The two appeals, were consolidated by order of the court, and are to be considered as one. The complaint charges a fraudulent conspiracy by the two defendants tO' sell to plaintiff certain corn to be resold for seed, knowing the same to be unfit for such purpose. After 'a careful examination of the entire record we find the following facts to be practically undisputed:

Plaintiff resided at Madison, Minn., and was engaged in the business of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dimmey v. Wheeling & E. G. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Helm v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Klockenbaum v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Bayonne Knife Co. v. UmbenHauerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SponierIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mid-Western Electric, Inc. v. DeWild Grant Reckert & Associates Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kotsonaros v. State of MinnesotaArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mid-Western Electric, Inc. v. DeWild Grant Reckert & Associates Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API