Legal Opinion

Kotsonaros v. State of Minnesota

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1955No. 5991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LA PRADE, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court granting plaintiff-appellee, the State of Minnesota, a new trial. Parties will be referred to by their lower court designations.

The facts necessary to a decision of this case are as follows. The State of Minnesota commenced an action in the superior court of Pima County and in its complaint alleged that the defendant, Nick D. Kot-sonaros, a resident of that county, was indebted to the State of Minnesota for nonpayment of state income taxes. The defendant admitted residency and generally denied the other allegations…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. DebrincatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Zevon v. TennebaumArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Jacobson v. HammanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Rogers v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mayo v. EphromArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. McMinnArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Zugsmith v. MullinsArizona Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API