Legal Opinion

Sandrini v. Branch

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1939No. Civ. 2267PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet their title to one hundred sixty acres of land in Kern County. Defendants asserted their title under an oil lease dated March 28, 1935, made by M. Sandrini, now deceased, the then owner of the property and predecessor in interest of plaintiffs, and the United Exploration Company of Los Angeles, lessee and assignor of defendant Ed Branch. The trial court found that the lease was not supported by any consideration and rendered judgment for plaintiffs. This appeal from the judgment followed.

Counsel present two questions for our consideration: (1) Is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scheel v. HarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Pimentel v. the Hall-Baker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Brownfield v. McFaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gavina v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Payne v. CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Kent v. First Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Alexander v. OatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API