Legal Opinion

Lawler v. Gleason

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1955No. Civ. 15933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

H. Glenn Lawler filed a complaint containing three counts. The first count is directed against Max and Ernest Manig and Sheriff Gleason. It is an action for declaratory relief seeking a declaration of the rights of the parties under various certificates of redemption issued by the sheriff, to determine whether a tender by Max Manig of $3,660.93 was sufficient to redeem rather than $10,469.05 demanded by plaintiff, and to determine whether Max Manig was legally capable of redeeming. The second cause of action names Max, Ernest and Paul Manig as defendants and seeks to quiet Lawler’s title to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simpson v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Shotwell v. BloomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Big Sespe Oil Co. v. CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  4. Brown v. TimmonsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Manig v. BachmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Salsbery v. RitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Claremont Terrace Homeowners' Ass'n v. United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Haye v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1978
  5. Call v. Thunderbird Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API