State v. Accor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The defendants, in essence, raise three questions on appeal.
1. Whether error was committed when the trial court allowed the in-court identification of defendants by the State’s witnesses and when, at the preliminary hearing, the court denied defendants’ motion to sequester the State’s witnesses.
2. Whether the trial court committed error by instructing the jury that it could return verdicts of either first-degree burglary or felonious breaking or entering.
3. Whether the trial court committed error by its additional instructions to the jury after the dinner recess.
The defendants…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- United States v. James Hugh RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. WestryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. QuilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982