Legal Opinion

Mead Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Exeter Mach. Works

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1914No. 122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Mead Morrison Manufacturing Company against the Exeter Machine Works. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

WITMER, District Judge.

In this suit, by bill in equity, the Mead Morrison Manufacturing Company charges the Exeter Machine Works with infringement of letters patent of the United States numbered 722,-613, granted March 10, 1903, upon the application of Almon E. Norris, filed May 3, 1902, and assigned to the complainant.

The invention relates to an improvement in hoisting apparatus, and the particular act of infringement charged is the construction arid installation, March, 1911, of a pair of superimposed engines in the tower of the Eastern Coal Company, located at the Dyer Street Wharf, at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Aron v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Morris v. McMillinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Exeter Mach. WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  2. Wappler Electric Co. v. Bronx Hospital & DispensaryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API