Legal Opinion
State v. Harms
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 2002No. 27213PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED JULY 2, 2002, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN
PERRY, Chief Judge.
The State of Idaho appeals from the district court’s order granting Larry Albert Harms Jr.’s motion to suppress evidence. The state contends that the district court erred when it concluded that a probation officer’s verbal request that Harms sign a property receipt constituted a custodial interrogation. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
Police were executing a search warrant at Harms’ home in an unrelated case when they observed two firearms in plain view. Officers were aware that Harms was on felony…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. GarciaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. CardenasIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004