Legal Opinion

State v. Cardenas

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 2007No. 31758PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Judge Pro Tem.

The state appeals from the district court’s order granting Adrian Albor Cardenas’ motion to suppress evidence. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand to the district court.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Two uniformed Sheriffs deputies went to a Nampa residence to look for a juvenile runaway named Sarah. The deputies saw Cardenas in a Nissan Sentra parked in the driveway. The deputies parked their patrol vehicles across the street. As the deputies began walking to the Sentra, Cardenas got out and started toward the house. A deputy told Cardenas “he needed to…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. Zapata-ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. Larry Glenn Fenton JrIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. ReederIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API