Legal Opinion
Apache Corp. v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 22, 2008No. Civil Action H-08-1064PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court are plaintiff Apache Corporation’s Original Complaint seeking a declaratory judgment (Dkt. 1) and application for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. 5.) The court combined the hearing on Apache’s request for injunctive relief with trial on the merits pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court has carefully reviewed the application, all responsive and supplemental pleadings, declarations and other record evidence, arguments of counsel, and the applicable law. For the reasons…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Apache Corp. v. CheveddenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Trinity Wall Street v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Kbr Inc. v. CheveddenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Trinity Wall Street v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- Trinity Wall Street v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015