Legal Opinion
Kbr Inc. v. Chevedden
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 9, 2011No. Civil Action H-11-0196PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
KBR has moved for summary judgment declaring that it may exclude John Chevedden’s proposal in the proxy materials for its May 2011 annual shareholders meeting. (Docket Entry No. 8). 1 Chevedden has filed a motion contesting venue, (Docket Entry No. 7); a motion to dismiss for lack of personal and subject-matter jurisdiction, (Docket Entry No. 9); and a motion to dismiss for failure to join the Securities and Exchange Commission (S.E.C.) as an indispensable party, (Docket Entry No. 12). Based on the motions, responses, and replies; the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tenet Healthcare Corp. v. Community Health System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2012
- Cambria County Employees Retirement System v. In re Venator Materials PLC Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
- Fonds Des Missions v. Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026