Legal Opinion
Trinity Wall Street v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 26, 2014No. C.A. No. 14-405-LPSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, U.S. District Judge:
Plaintiff, Trinity Wall Street (“Trinity” or “Plaintiff’), owns shares of common stock of Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (‘Wal-Mart” or “Defendant”), which is the *621world’s largest retailer. Trinity seeks declaratory judgments to the effect that Wal-Mart violated federal securities laws when it refused to include in its proxy materials relating to its 2014 annual shareholders meeting a proposal submitted by Trinity that would have added to the obligations of one of Wal-Mart’s Board of Directors committees, and that Wal-Mart will again violate these…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trinity Wall Street v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Trinity Wall Street v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015