Legal Opinion
Guillermo Gallego Munoz v. County of Imperial
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1982No. 19-16384PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
1. BACKGROUND
Defendant McDougal owns land in the County of Imperial (“County”). With the land, McDougal acquired a conditional use permit which allowed him to sell water on condition that it be sold only for use within the county. 1 McDougal’s neighbors complained to the county about water trucks leaving his property, and the county sued in superior court to enforce the prohibition in the conditional use permit against selling water outside the county. 2
The superior court enjoined McDougal from conducting his trucking operation. The California Court of Appeal held that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mitchum v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- U-Haul International, Inc., an Oregon Corp. v. Jartran, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and James A. RyderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Silent Drive, Inc. v. Strong Industries, Inc. And Brooks StrongCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Skretvedt v. E.I. DuPont De NemoursCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Prudential Real Estate Affiliates, Inc. v. PPR Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.