Legal Opinion
U-Haul International, Inc., an Oregon Corp. v. Jartran, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and James A. Ryder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1986No. 84-2801PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
U-Haul International, Inc. (U-Haul) sued Jartran, Inc. (Jartran) for false comparative advertising under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and under the common law. The district court awarded U-Haul $40 million and attorney fees, as well as a permanent injunction against certain Jartran advertisements. U-Haul International, Inc. v. Jartran, Inc., 601 F.Supp. 1140 (D.Ariz.1984). Jartran appeals on several grounds. To facilitate our discussion of the issues raised by Jar-tran’s appeal, our opinion is organized in the following manner. In Part I of this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. SykesSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Ppx Enterprises, Inc., Mod Music, Inc., and J.H. Records, Inc., Ppx Enterprises, Inc. v. Audiofidelity Enterprises, Inc. And Dante J. PuglieseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.