Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1942No. 2348Published

1ConcurrencePhillips, Circuit Judge

The amended complaint in this case as originally drafted sounded in conversion. This court, in United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co., 10 Cir., 113 F. 2d 194, held that none of the oil produced under the leases from Osage Tribe of Indians belonged to the Tribe. Thereupon, the United States abandoned the conversion theory. Instead of recasting the pleading, the United States simply amended the pleading by eliminating therefrom certain of the allegations relating to conversion, and sought to maintain its action on the theory of fraud and deceit.

The amended complaint as finally…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Bates v. Escondido Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Jamestown Iron & Metal Co. v. KnofskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API