Arizona Cotton Ginning Co. v. Nichols
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
Appellant, Arizona Cotton Ginning Company, plaintiff, sued appellees, Buck and Earl Nichols, on a promissory note executed by Buck and Earl Nichols. Trial was to the court and judgment was rendered against Earl Nichols on an open account for $8,-965.51, plus 61^ percent interest, together with attorneys’ fees and costs. Buck Nichols was found to be released from the obligation and recovered his costs from plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from the Buck Nichols judgment only.
Taking the facts most favorable to sustaining the judgment, State v. Carr, 8 Ariz.App. 300, 445 P.2d 857…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Silva v. TraverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Danielson v. Bank of ScandinaviaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Hamilton v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jinro America Inc. v. Secure Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- City of Tucson v. MelnykovichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Greene v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Solar-West, Inc. v. FalkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- In Re ShoenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.